Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J
COMMUNIDADE OF CALAPUR – Appellant
Versus
HIRABAI K. KAVLEKAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application challenging order rejecting plaint. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claim of tenancy with jurisdictional bar under agricultural tenancy act. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. dispossessing claims and ongoing agricultural activities disputed. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. jurisdiction of disputes outlined in sections 8(a), 58(b). (Para 21 , 22 , 26 , 28) |
| 5. court concludes that the plaint is barred by the agricultural tenancy act. (Para 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT:
1. his is revision iled by the defendant thereby challenging the impugned order dated 07/09/2017 passed by the learned Civil Court in Regular Civil Suit No.67/2017/C thereby rejecting the application iled under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of CPC.
2. his revision was admitted on 08/02/2018 and is tagged with Civil Revision Application No.40 of 2019, since Civil Revision Application No.40/2019 is arising out of rejection of the application iled under Order 7 Rule 11 for dismissal of the counterclaim.
3. Heard Mr Sawant appearing for the applicant, Ms Asha Desai appearing for respondent No.1 and Ms Sonadevi Nishad appearing for respondents No.2,3 and 4. With their assistance I have perused the paper book containing plaint, relevan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
