Candida Conceicao Texeira Freitas vs Mr. Ganganeli Jose Julio Pereira

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 1789

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
M. S. KARNIK, J
Candida Conceicao Texeira Freitas – Appellant
Versus
Mr. Ganganeli Jose Julio Pereira – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Shivan Desai, Ms. Tahira Menezes, Mr. V. Bhandankar
For the Respondents: Mr. Jatin Ramaiya, Mr. Omkar Thakur, Mr. M. B. D’Costa, Mr. Rehan Abbasi

Table of Content
1. marriage and divorce laws prevalent in portugal apply. (Para 2 , 6)
2. legal status of goa post-liberation and continuing laws. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. overview of inventory proceedings and appellant's involvement. (Para 8)
4. argument for appellant's rights under portuguese civil code. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. respondent argues for deletion based on misunderstanding of facts. (Para 18 , 21 , 22)
6. clarification of applicable laws to inventory proceedings. (Para 19 , 20)
7. continuity of the portuguese civil code and its implications. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
8. community of property and inheritance rights after partition. (Para 34 , 35 , 45)
9. distinguishing previous decisions based on facts. (Para 46 , 47 , 48)
10. final dismissal of the appeal and acknowledgment of counsel's assistance. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53)

ORAL JUDGMENT

The challenge in this Appeal preferred by the appellant is to an order dated 04.02.2022 passed by the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, at Margao, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Inventory Court' for short) in Regular Inventory Proceeding no.33/2010/I. The Inventory court by the impugned order has allowed the application dated 01.02.2021, fled by th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 1789

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAYM. S. KARNIK, JCandida Conceicao Texeira Freitas – AppellantVersusMr. Ganganeli Jose Julio Pereira – Respondent

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
M. S. KARNIK, J
Candida Conceicao Texeira Freitas – Appellant
Versus
Mr. Ganganeli Jose Julio Pereira – Respondent