Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
M. S. KARNIK, J
SATISH ANKUSH KAMBLE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court assessed the circumstances warranting bail consideration. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. the investigation status and assurance of cooperation mitigate the need for continued custody. (Para 6) |
ORDER
a) Issue notice to Respondent, returnable on 17th January, 2023.
b) The learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of Respondent-State.
c) In the meanwhile, in the event of the arrest of the Applicant in C.R. No. 547 of 2022, registered at City Police Station, Pandharpur, he be released on bail on furnishing a P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- and one or two sureties in the like amount.
d) The Applicant shall cooperate with the investigation and attend the City Police Station, Pandharpur, on every Saturday from 10:00AM to 1:00PM, till the next date.
e) The Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and/or give threat or inducement to any of the prosecution witnesses.”
4. Learned counsel for the applicant invited my attention to the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandhrpur while releasing the co-accused Ashok Bhikaji Vairage on bail. The relevant portion of the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge reads thus: -
“6. If F.I.R. is perused, i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
