Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
N.J. Jamadar, J
Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Gangaram Dagade – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts of the case (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by the parties (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. legal principles on interim relief (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. court's analysis on the authority to grant interim relief (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. court's reasoning on employee dismissal (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 6. court's view on subsistence allowance (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 7. legal standards for dismissal and inquiry (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 8. arguments on employer's rights (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 9. conclusion on dismissal and inquiry process (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 10. modification of interim relief order (Para 63) |
| 11. final order and conclusions of the court (Para 64 , 65 , 66) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, heard finally.
2. Since common questions crop up for consideration in all these Petitions, arising out of identical facts, these Petitions were heard together and are decided by a common judgment. Writ Petition No.202 of 2023 is considered as the lead Petition and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
