BOMBAY HIGH COURT
BHARATI DANGRE, J
Kishor Shankarrao Hile – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1] The Appellants in two Appeals placed before me stand convicted in Special Case No.6/1997, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, Alibag, through the Judgment delivered on 25.04.2003.
2] Accused No.1 Kishor Hile (in Criminal Appeal No.788/2003), before the learned Judge, who was working as Talathi, stood convicted for committing an offence punishable under Section 7 and 13(i)d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 . He was sentenced to suffer RI for 6 months on being convicted under Section 7 and to suffer RI for 1 year, on being convicted under Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Accused No.2 Pandurang Kumbhar (in Criminal Appeal No.661/2003), who was working as Circle Officer is convicted for committing offence under Section 7 as well as under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to suffer RI for 6 months.
The substantive sentences in case of both the accused were directed to run concurrently.
3] During the pendency of these Appeals, the Appellant Pandurang Kumbhar has expired and this fact is confirmed by the learned APP and hence Criminal Appeal No.661/2003 stands abated.
It leaves me with Accused No.1 Kisho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.