Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
G. S. Kulkarni, J
Mukund Hari Mhatre (since decd.) through LRs. – Appellant
Versus
Madhukar Dwarkanath Kadam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. land ownership dispute and unauthorized possession. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. distinction and application of relevant legal provisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. final ruling and directions for further proceedings. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
1. Heard Mr. Pilankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Karandikar, learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 and 8.
2. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenges an order dated 5 September, 2013 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (for short “MRT”) whereby a Revision Application as filed by respondent nos. 1 to 8 (for short “the respondents”) has been allowed, thereby setting aside the order dated 28 December, 2009 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer in BD/Tenancy Appeal No. 24/2007 and the order dated 13 July, 2007 passed by the Tahsildar & A.L.T. Vasai in Tenancy Case no. 84/1/05 was restored.
3. It is the petitioners case that petitioner no. 1 was the purchaser/owner of agricultural land, bearing Survey no. 91, Hissa no. 1 and Survey no. 91, Hissa No. 2 admeasuring 32670 sq. yards and 2700 sq. mts. respectively, situated at Village Valiv, Taluka Vasai, District Thane. It is stat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
