HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai, J
Sau. Sunita Pruthaviraj Meshram – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
01] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of learned counsel for the parties.
02] The Petitioner challenges the order dated 02.08.2021 passed by the Respondent No.2 - Additional Commissioner in exercise of powers conferred under Section 39 (1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”) and the order dated 5.10.2021 passed by the Respondent No.1 – Minister rejecting the appeal preferred by the Petitioner under Section 39 (3) of the said Act.
03] The Petitioner is a duly elected Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat Tekadi (Coal-Mine), Parseoni, Nagpur. She has been elected from Scheduled Caste category by direct election process for a term of five years, which is due to expire in the year 2022. In view of complaint received from some of the members, Respondent No.3 – C.E.O. directed the Respondent No.4 - B.D.O. to conduct an enquiry. Pursuant to the preliminary report submitted by the B.D.O., Respondent No.3 allegedly conducted an enquiry under Section 39 (1) of the said Act with permission of Respondent No.2. The Respondent No.2 has removed the Petitioner from the office of Sarpanch acting upon the report
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.