BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PARVATIBAI ANNARAO DESHMUKH AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
MANGLABAI VYANKAT PAWAR AND ANOTHER – Respondent
WP 5864/2022
2-WP NO.5864 OF 2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5864 OF 2022
PARVATIBAI ANNARAO DESHMUKH AND OTHERS
VERSUS
MANGLABAI VYANKAT PAWAR AND ANOTHER
. . .
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. S. N. Rodge h/f. Mr. Satish P. Dhobale
. . .
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 22 JUNE 2022
PER COURT :
1.
The petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of his application
seeking appointment of court commissioner to carry out measurement.
2.
I have heard the learned advocate for the petitioners.
3.
The petitioners are the original plaintiffs’ seeking perpetual
injunction and also praying for carrying out measurement for fixation of the
boundaries. Even before the trial would begin and even before they step into
witness box, they sought assistance of the court for appointing the court
commissioner to carry out the measurement.
4.
This Court has consistently held that a party has to first make an
attempt to establish the facts and averments in the plaint and is not entitled to
1/2
2-WP NO.5864 OF 2022.odt
seek assistance of the court, even before stepping into the witness box and the
trial commences.
5.
Though the learned Judge of the trial court has not referred to
these decisions and is not coming out with the same reasoning, there is no
illegality in the order refusing to appoint the court commissioner.
6.
There is no merit in the petition, it is dismissed, keeping open the
option to the petitioners to once again apply for appointment of commissioner
at an appropriate stage.
( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
Tandale/-
2/2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.