SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 5067

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PRAVIN ALIM SAYYED AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['MALI D S', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'PATIL HANMANT V']

wp13668-19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 13668 OF 2019

1.

Pravin Alim Sayyed,

Age 40 years, Occu: Household

... Petitioners

2.

Alim Yusufsab Sayyed

Agd 52 years, Occu: Agri.

Both r/o Sanskruti Nagar,

Opp. Rukmini Mangal Karyalaya,

Latur, Tq. & Dist. Latur

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra,

Through the Secretary

Department of Urban Development,

Mantralaya, Mumbai

2.

The Assistant Director of Town Planning,

Municipal Corporation Latur,

District Latur.

3.

The Latur Municipal Corporation, Latur

Through its Commissioner

... Respondents

Mr. D.S. Mali, Advocate for the petitioners,

Mrs. V. N. Patil-Jadhav, AGP for respondent No. 1-State

Mr. H. V. Patil, Advocate for respondent No. 3-Corporation

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL &

Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE

: 29.11.2022

JUDGMENT ( Per Y. G. Khobragade, J.):

1.

We have heard learned counsel for both sides.

2.

Rule, made returnable forthwith. With the consent of both the

sides, the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission.

Page 1 of 6

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top