2022 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 5083
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. G. AVACHAT
KAVILETHU NEELAKANTAN RAJAN AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
UDAILAL RAMNARAYANI AHIR AND ANR – Respondent
FA/2748/2009
First Appeal No.2748/2009
:: 1 ::
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL NO.2748 OF 2009
1.
Shri Kavilethu Neelakantan Rajan,
Age 52 years, Occu. Pensioner,
2.
Sow. Amibily w/o Kavilethu Rajan,
Age 43 years, Occu. Housewife
Both R/o H.No.2125, Vidyanagar,
Arangaon Road, Ahmednagar
… APPELLANTS
VERSUS
1.
Udailal Ramnarayani Ahir,
Age 42 years, Occu. Transport,
R/o Village Jojro-ka-Kheda,
Tehsil Gangras, Dist. Chittorgarh,
Rajasthan, PIN – 312 001
2.
The Manager,
I.C.I.C.I. Lombard Motor Insurance,
Zenith house, Keshavrao Khade Marg,
Mahalaxmi, Mumbai – 400 034
(Notice to be served on the
Manager, ICICI Lombard Motor
Insurance, Adventure Towers,
In front of Oberoi Hotel,
Zopadi Canteen, Savedi Road,
Ahmednagar)
… RESPONDENTS
.......
Shri A.C. Darandale, Advocate for appellants
Smt. A.N. Ansari, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Shri R.H. Dahat with
Shri S.S. Patil, Advocates for respondent No.2.
....…
First Appeal No.2748/2009
:: 2 ::
CORAM :
R. G. AVACHAT, J.
Date of reserving judgment : 29th November, 2021
Date of pronouncing judgment : 28th January, 2022.
J U D G M E N T :
This is an appeal for enhancement of
compensation granted by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
(MACT), Ahmednagar on account of death in vehicular
accident. The Motor Accident Claim Petition (MACP) was
preferred by the appellants – parents of the deceased Rakesh.
The Tribunal granted a lumpsum compensation of
Rs.6,00,000/- along with interest @ 6% p.a. The appellants –
claimants, feeling the compensation to have been grossly
inadequate, have preferred the present appeal.
2.
Facts giving rise to the present appeal are as
follows :-
3.
The deceased Rakesh was the only child of the
appellants herein. He was Last Year student of M.B.A. He
was to appear for the last semester of the M.B.A. He had
cleared all the examinations with very good performance. In
a Campus interview, the Reliance Securities India Ltd. had
offered him a job with annual pay package of Rs.3,00,000/-.
First Appeal No.2748/2009
:: 3 ::
Deceased Rakesh was 22 years of age. He died in an
accident involving motorbike and the truck.
4.
The learned counsel for the appellants would
submit that, the deceased Rakesh had very bright future. He
was the only child of the appellants. He had been offered a
pay package of Rs.3,00,000/- p.a. by a renowned industry.
The Tribunal ought to have granted compensation applying
the requisite formula given in various judgments of the Apex
Court. According to learned counsel, the Apex Court, in case
of Krishna Moorthy (2020) 15 SCC 493, has given certain
principles regarding grant of compensation in case of death of
a student. The learned counsel has also relied on the
following two authorities, to ultimately submit that, the
Tribunal ought to have granted just and adequate
compensation :
(1)
(2020) 15 SCC 493 [ M.R. Krishna Murthi Vs. New India
Assurance Company Ltd. and others ]
(2)
(2015) 2 SCC 180 [ Ashvinbhai Jayantilal Modi Vs.
Ramkaran Ramchandra Sharma & anr. ]
(3)
(2020) 9 SCC 644 [ New India Assurance Company
Limited Vs. Somwati & ors. etc. etc. ]
First Appeal No.2748/2009
:: 4 ::
5.
Learned counsel for the appellants, therefore,
urged for allowing the appeal.
6.
Learned counsel for the respondent Insurance
Company would, on the other hand, submit that, the
deceased was a student. The alleged offer of job was post
the deceased breathed his last. The offer was conditional and
as such, was contingent upon various factors. The deceased
died bachelor. His father, one of the appellants, is an Ex-
serviceman. The mother of the deceased could be said to be
dependent on her husband alone. According to learned
counsel, the Tribunal, in the facts and circumstances of the
case, has granted adequate compensation. There is no
warrant for interference with the impugned award