SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 4435

SHAIKH AZIMODDIN ZAINODDIN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHAILESH BRAHME P AND A R SYED', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'CAVEAT FILED BY ADV HARSAHL P RANDHIR', 'AGP', 'ADV H P RANDHIR', 'Kazi S S', 'SHAIKH TAREK MOBIN H']

.. 1 .. WP.3000.2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.3000 OF 2021

Shaikh Azimoddin Zainoddin

Age : 54 years, Occu : service as I/c. H.M.

R/o.Anglo Urdu High School,

Bhadgaon, Tq. Bhadgaon,

Dist. Jalgaon

.. Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra

through its Principal Secretary

School Education Department,

Mantralaya, Mumbai.

2.

The Education Officer (Secondary)

Zilha Parishad, Jalgaon

Taluka & Dist. Jalgaon

3.

The Bhadgaon Taluka Urdu Education

Society, Bhadgaon

Office : Zakatdar Gali, Bhadgaon

Tq. Bhadgaon, Dist. Jalgaon,

Through its Secretary

4.

Mirza Nazim Beg Hakim Beg

R/o. Anglo Urdu High School,

Jalali Mohalla, Bhadgaon,

Tq. Bhadgaon, Dist. Jalgaon

.. Respondents

...

Mr. Shailesh Brahme & Mr. A.R. Syed, Advocate for the Petitioner

Mr. K.N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2

Mr. S.S. Kazi and Mr. Tarek Mobin H. Shaikh, Advocate for

Respondent No.3

Mr. P.D. Bachate h/f. Mr. H.P. Randhir, advocate for respondent no.4 –

Caveator

..

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top