JAVED KHATRI @ MACHHAR MOHD. JAVED HANIFBHAI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent
IA 2534/2021
1 of 5 2.IA.2534.2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2534 OF 2021
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.862 OF 2021
Javed Khatri @ Machhar Mohd. Javed Hanifbhai
Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra and another
Respondents
Mr.Pankaj Pandey with Mr.Firoz Shaikh, Advocate for applicant.
Mr.R.R.Nair, Advocate for respondent no.2.
Mr.Arfan Sait, APP, for State.
Mr.Babasaheb Dukale, P.I, and Mr.Anil Bhabal, PSI, Dongri Police
Station, present.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE : 4th April 2022
PC :
1.
This is an application for suspension of sentence and grant of
bail during pendency of Criminal Appeal No.862 of 2021. The
applicant has been convicted for offence under Section 376 of Indian
Penal Code and under Section 4 of Protection of Children from
Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (`POCSO Act’). He has been sentenced to
undergo imprisonment of ten years and pay fine of Rs.1,00,000/-.
He was acquitted for the offence under Sections 37, 506 of IPC and
under Section 12 of POCSO Act.
2.
The case of prosecution is that the accused is a married person
and neighbour of victim. The victim was aged around 14 years 7
months at the tie of incident. The accused and the complainant are
residing on the same floor. Both the families are on visiting terms at
MANISH
SURESH
THATTE
Digitally signed by
MANISH SURESH
THATTE
Date: 2022.04.05 17:14:32
+0530
2 of 5 2.IA.2534.2021.doc
each others houses. At the relevant time the victim was studying in
8th standard. She was attending tuition with PW-5. On 1st April 2019
the victim girl and her friend who reside in the same building left for
tuition. The friend of victim was told by the victim to wait below the
building and the victim girl went to the house to get her pencil pouch
and return shortly. Since the victim girl did not return, the victim’
s
friend went to the house of victim to enquire whether she is coming
for tuition. The complainant is the mother of victim. On enquiry by
the friend of victim she got alarmed since the teacher of the victim
had informed her that accused was inappropriately touching the
victim. The complainant felt that victim must be in the house of
accused. So she called neighbour (PW-9) who knocked the door of
accused. The door was opened the door partially and accused
informed that his wife is not at the home. The complainant heard
sobbing voice of the victim coming behind the door of accused. PW-
9 and the complainant found that victim was behind the door in the
house of accused and she was crying and scared. The accused stated
that victim does not want to go for tuition class and therefore she is
sitting in his house. The victim on the next day revealed to the
teacher that on the earlier day when she left for tuition, the accused
met her down at the building. He forced and threatened her to come
to his house. He forcibly removed her clothes and committed sexual
intercourse. He also outraged her modesty. The victim also
disclosed to her tuition teacher that accused had touched her
inappropriately on two occasions in the month of March-2019. The
teacher had noticed that victim was not paying attention to her
studies. The victim embressed the teacher and started crying. The
victim disclosed the acts committed by the accused. Thereafter they
went to Police Station and lodged the FIR. The victim was sent for
3 of 5 2.IA.2534.2021.doc
medical examination. On completing investigation charge sheet was
filed.
3.
The prosecution had examined about 11 witnesses By
judgment and order dated 10th August 2021 the applicant-accused
was convicted for the aforesaid offences.
4.
Learned advocate for applicant submitted that the applican
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.