Advocates:
['Shelke Shivaji T', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'WAGH SHIRINIVAS S']

(1)

wp4987.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

951 WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022

Divate Vinod S/o. Bhimraj,

...PETITIONER

Age-34 years, Occu-Asst. Teacher,

R/o. Ku8mabharwadi, Tq. Sangamner,

Dist. Ahmednagar

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra,

...RESPONDENTS

Through the Principal Secretary,

Secondary School Education Department,

Mantralaya, Mumabai-32

2.

The Deputy Director of Education,

Pune Region, Pune, 411 001

3.

The Education Officer (Secondary),

Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar

4.

Sahyadri Bahujan Vidya Prasarak Samaj,

A/p. & Tq. Sangamner, Dist. Ahmednagar,

Pin Code 422 605

Through its Secretary

5.

Sahakarmaharshi Bhausaheb Santuji Thorat,

Madhyamik Vidyalaya, A/P Khali,

Tq. Sangamner, Dist. Ahmednager

Through its Headmaster

Mr.Shivaji T. Shelke, Advocate for the petitioner

Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for the respondents/State

AND

954 WRIT PETITION NO. 5003 OF 2022

Vaidya Pallavi D/o. Badshaha,

...PETITIONER

Age-29 years, Occu-Asst. Teacher,

1 of 7

(2)

wp4987.22.odt

R/o. Kolhewadi, Tq. Sangamner,

Dist. Ahmednagar

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra,

...RESPONDENTS

Through the Principal Secretary,

Secondary School Education Department,

Mantralaya, Mumabai-32

2.

The Deputy Director of Education,

Pune Region, Pune, 411 001

3.

The Education Officer (Secondary),

Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar

4.

Sahyadri Bahujan Vidya Prasarak Samaj,

A/p. & Tq. Sangamner, Dist. Ahmednagar,

Pin Code 422 605

Through its Secretary

5.

Bhimaji Ambuji Shinde Biroba Vidyalaya

A/P Rahimpur, Tq. Sangamner,

Dist. Ahmednager

Through its Headmaster

Mr.Shivaji T. Shelke, Advocate for the petitioner

Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for the respondents/State

AND

969 WRIT PETITION NO. 2752 OF 2022

Gorde Hemant Sopan,

...PETITIONER

Age-31 years, Occu-Service,

R/o. Astagaon, Tq. Rahata,

Dist. Ahmednagar

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra,

...RESPONDENTS

Through the Principal Secretary,

2 of 7

(3)

wp4987.22.odt

Secondary School Education Department,

Mantralaya, Mumabai-32

2.

The Deputy Director of Education,

Pune Region, Pune, 411 001

3.

The Education Officer (Secondary),

Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar

4.

Shri Ganesh Vidya Prasarak Mandal,

Ganesh Nagar, Post Ranjangaon (Kd),

Tq. Rahata, Dist. Ahmednagar,

Through its Executive Trustee

5.

Rajmata Jijau Madhyamik Vidyalaya,

Ganesh Nagar, Ranjangaon, (Kd)

Tq. Rahata, Dist. Ahmednagar,

Through its Headmaster

Mr.Shivaji T. Shelke, Advocate for the petitioner

Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for the respondents/State

Mr. S. S. Wagh, Advocate for the respondent Nos. 4

and 5

AND

970 WRIT PETITION NO. 2775 OF 2022

Thombre Nandkumar Madhukar,

...PETITIONER

Age-31 years, Occu-Service,

R/o. Shirdi, Tq. Rahata,

Dist. Ahmednagar

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra,

...RESPONDENTS

Through the Principal Secretary,

Secondary School Education Department,

Mantralaya, Mumabai-32

2.

The Deputy Director of Education,

Pune Region, Pune, 411 001

3 of 7

(4)

wp4987.22.odt

3.

The Education Officer (Secondary),

Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar

4.

Shri Ganesh Vidya Prasarak Mandal,

Ganesh Nagar, Post Ranjangaon (Kd)

Tq. Rahata, Dist. Ahmednagar,

Through its Executive Trustee

5.

Jai Hanuman Vidyalaya,

At Ranjangaon Deshmukh,

Tq. Kopargaon, Dist. Ahmednagar

Through its Headmaster

Mr.Shivaji T. Shelke, Advocate for the petitioner

Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for the respondents/State

Mr. S. S. Wagh, Advocate for the respondent Nos. 4

and 5

CORAM:R. D. DHANUKA &

S. G. MEHARE, JJ.

DATE:04^th May, 2022

JUDGMENT:

1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

2.

The learned AGP waives service of notice

for the respondents/State.

3.

By this petition filed under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed

for setting aside the order passed by the Dy.

Director Education dated 08-04-2022 regarding

4 of 7

(5)

wp4987.22.odt

rejection of the proposal for inclusion of name of

the petitioner in Shalarth ID for monthly salary

payments.

4.

It is not in dispute that the Education

o