SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
NITIN ASHOK PATIL AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['SALUNKE MAYUR V', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'DESHMUKH MAHESH S', 'AGP']

{1}

wp3796-22

drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.3796 OF 2022

Nitin Ashok Patil and Others

PETITIONERS

VERSUS

The Additional Commissioner and Others

RESPONDENTS

.......

Mr. Mayur V. Salunke Advocate for the petitioners

Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for respondent - State

Mr. M. S. Deshmukh,Advocate for respondents No.3 to 5

....…

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]

DATE : 20

th APRIL, 2022

ORDER :

1.

The petitioners are elected as members of village

Panchayat Karmad (Khurd), Taluka – Parola, District – Jalgaon in

the election held on 15th January, 2021. Respondents No.3 to 5

sought disqualification of the petitioners by filing proceedings

under section sections 14-B (2) and 16 of the Maharashtra

Village Panchayat Act, 1958 (hereinafter for short “the said Act”)

contending that the petitioners have failed to submit the account

of election expenses within a period of thirty days from the date

of declaration of the election result i.e. 18th January, 2021. The

{2}

wp3796-22

petitioners opposed said proceedings, by filing say that the

petitioners have filed election

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top