SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
TUSHAR TUKARAM CHAVAN AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


aba-567-2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.567 OF 2022

1.

Tushar s/o Tukaram Chavan

2.

Ronak s/o Tukaram Chavan

… Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

… Respondent

Mr. S. R. Andhale, Advocate for applicants.

Mr. V. M. Kagne, APP for the respondent – State.

...

CORAM

:SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE

: 06.05.2022

ORDER :-

.

Heard learned Advocate for the applicant.

2.

Learned APP strongly opposes the application for grant of any

interim relief. He submits that the matter is coming for the first time

and he is yet to receive the police papers, however, taking into

consideration the role attributed to the applicants in the First

Information Report, interim protection need not be granted.

3.

Perusal of the FIR lodged by the informant – prosecutrix would

show that she is aged 33 and she is accepting a fact that she was having

a love affair with one Anil Chavan. The present applicants are the

(1)

aba-567-2022.odt

cousin brothers of said Anil. According to the prosecutrix the incident

had taken place on 21.03.2022 at about 11.00 a.m. She has lodged the

report on 22.03.2022 i.e. on the nex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top