SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
P. ANITA SHRINIWAS RAO AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


34-WP-2297-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2297 OF 2022

1. P. Anita Shriniwas Rao

2. Paramata Srinivasarao

...Petitioners

Versus

State Of Maharashtra

...Respondent

….

Mr. Prabhanjay R. Dave, Advocate for the Petitioners.

Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent – State.

….

CORAM

:

PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE

:

26th JULY, 2022.

PER COURT

:

1.

The petitioners have challenged the order dated 21st April,

2021 passed by the Special Judge, under POCSO Act, 2012, Greater

Mumbai in POCSO Special Case No.527 of 2015 to the extent of

directions issued to Senior Inspector of Nagpada Police Station,

about the closure of Room Nos. 11 and 12, situated at Bori Chawl,

1st Floor, Opposite Apollo Hotel, 11th Lane, Kamathipura, Nagpada,

Mumbai, within a period of 7 days from the date of order. The said

order was passed in exercise of powers under Section 18 of the

Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (for short ‘

PITA Act’).

2.

The petitioners contend that, they were required to shift at

her native place in Andhra Pradesh and let out their room premises

Sajakali Jamadar

1 of 6

SAJAKALI

LIYAKAT

JAMAD

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top