SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 8997

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK RAMDAS PATIL AND ANR – Respondent


29. Apeal-1046-2007.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1046 OF 2007

The State of Maharashtra

…Appellant

Versus

1. Ashok Ramdas Patil

Age about 61 years, Occu : Retired

R/o Apte Road, Pune

2. Ramchandra Devchand Mali

Age about 63 years, Occu : Retired

R/o. Karve Road, Pune.

…Respondents

Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the Appellant State.

Mr. Vijay Killedar, Advocate for the Respondent No.1.

CORAM

:

PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE

:

6th JANUARY, 2022.

ORAL JUDGMENT

:

1.

This appeal is preferred by the State of Maharashtra

under Section 378 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

(for short “Cr.P.C.”) challenging the judgment and order dated

27th September, 2005 acquitting the respondent – accused for the

offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13(2) and

Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short

“PC Act”).

2.

During the pendency of this appeal, the respondent

No.2 has expired. The death certi昀椀cate of respondent No.2 has

Sajakali Jamadar

1 of 19

29. Apeal-1046-2007.doc

been produced by the learned counsel for the appellant which

indicate that the respondent No

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top