1 902-FA-544-2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

902 FIRST APPEAL NO.544 OF 2007

WITH FA/2025/2021 WITH FA/511/2007 WITH FA/516/2007

WITH FA/512/2007 WITH FA/1368/2020

RAMA ASHROBA ZOL L.RS. MADABAI

RAMA ZOL AND ORS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

...

Advocate for Appellants : Mr D.M. Kakade

AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 /State : Mr S.G. Sangle

Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Ms Shrutika Deshpande h/f Mr Anand Chawre

Advocate for Respondent No. 3 in FA No.2025/2021 : Mr S.C. Arora

Advocate for Respondent No. 3 in FA 1368/2020 : Mr B.R. Surwase

...

CORAM : SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 16^th March, 2022

PER COURT :

1.

Mr D.M. Kakade, learned counsel for the appellants, Mr S.C. Arora,

learned counsel respondent No. 3/acquiring body, Mr S.C. Arora, learned

counsel for respondent No. 3 in First Appeal No. 2025/2021, Mr B.R. Surwase,

learned counsel for respondent No. 3 in First Appeal No. 1368/2020 and

Mr S.G. Sangle, learned AGP for the State are present.

2.

It is stated across the bar that this group of six appeals have been

settled before the Lok Adalat. However, while submitting the joint compromise

pursis, incorrect first appeal against different LARs were mentioned. As such,

the learned counsel for the respective sides seeks correction in respective joint

compromise pursis.

3.

In the circulation note, the chart is given by the acquiring body to

which the learned counsel for the original claimants have given no objection.

2 902-FA-544-2007

4.

Having regard to the above scenario and upon submissions of

learned counsel for both the sides and the learned AGP for the State, the parties

are hereby permitted to correct the first appeal numbers against their respective

LAR numbers and further permitted to place respective compromise pursis in

the respective first appeals.

5.

Motion is disposed of Accordingly.

( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.)

mta