SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

SHRIRANG RAMCHANDRA SUTAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS – Respondent
WP 776/2021



18 WP776-21gr.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO.776 OF 2021

Shrirang Ramchandra Sutar

….. Petitioner

Vs.

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

….. Respondents

WITH

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.95650 OF 2020

WITH

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.95653 OF 2020

WITH

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.95654 OF 2020

WITH

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.95658 OF 2020

Mr.Rajendra Anantrao Choudhari for the Petitioner

Mr.R.P.Kadam, A.G.P. for the State in Writ Petition No.776 of

2021 and Writ Petition (ST) No.95650 of 2020

Mrs.P.J.Gavhane, A.G.P. for the State in Writ Petition (ST)

NO.95653 of 2020

Mr.S.S.Panchpor, A.G.P. for the State in Writ Petition (ST)

No.95654 of 2020

Mr.A.P.Vanarase, A.G.P. for the State in Writ Petition (ST)

No.95658 of 2020

CORAM:

K.K.TATED &

RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATED :

MARCH 8, 2021

Mohite

1/2

Trusha T.

Mohite

Digitally signed by

Trusha T. Mohite

Date: 2021.03.10

12:20:30 +0530

18 WP776-21gr.odt

P.C.

.

Heard.

2.

By these petitions, under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, Petitioners are seeking direction

against the Respondents to allot the Petitioner alternate

land being project affected person under the Maharashtra

Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999.

3.

In the present proceedings, it is the case of the

Petitioner that the Respondents acquired their land some

time in the year 1959 and failed and neglected to provide

them alternate land. Hence, they preferred the present

Writ Petitions.

4.

When this Court declined to entertain the present Writ

Petitions on the ground of delay and latches of more than 60

years, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he

received instruction from his client to withdraw all these

Petitions unconditionally. Same is accepted. To that effect,

the learned counsel for the Petitioner has given in writing.

Same is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identifcation.

Same is accepted.

5.

All the Writ Petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn.

6.

No order as to costs.

(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.)

(K.K.TATED, J.)

Mohite

2/2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top