902-sa-1054-2006.doc

Sonali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

SECOND APPEAL NO.1054 OF 2006

WITH

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.30385 OF 2022

Shri Premnath Rangnath Aakade

...Appellant

Versus

Shri Anandrao Sampatrao Bankar

...Respondent

Mr. Yuvraj P. Narvankar, for the Appellant.

Mr. P. N. Joshi, for the Respondent.

CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED : 20^th DECEMBER 2022

P.C. :

1.

Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar, learned counsel appearing for the

Appellant and Mr. P. N. Joshi, learned counsel appearing for the

Respondent tender the Consent Terms (rMtksMi=). The said

Consent Terms are in Marathi and they are signed by the

parties i.e. both the Appellant-Premnath Rangnath Aakade and

Respondent-Anandrao Sampatrao Bankar. Both of them are

present in Court and state that they have compromised the

matter and Consent Terms are acceptable to both of them. Both

1/2

902-sa-1054-2006.doc

Sonali

of them state that they will implement their respective

obligations mentioned in the Consent Terms within the time

limit as agreed between the parties and more particularly set

out in the Consent Terms.

2.

The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’

for identification.

3.

Both the parties undertake that the time-schedule

mentioned in the Consent Terms and the obligations of the

respective parties mentioned in the Consent Terms will be

complied with. The aforesaid undertakings are accepted.

4.

The Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the Consent

Terms.

5.

In view of the disposal of the Second Appeal, nothing

survives in the Interim Applications and the same are disposed

of accordingly.

6.

The Second Appeal No.1032 of 2006 is detagged and

adjourned to 23^rd January 2023 along with Interim Application

filed in said Second Appeal.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

2/2

SONALI

MILIND

PATIL

Digitally

signed by

SONALI

MILIND

PATIL

Date:

2022.12.22

09:40:21

+0530