SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LATA DADARAO PAWAR @ SMT. AYESHA AMIR SHAIKH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS – Respondent


CRIWP2632-2021.DOC

Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO. 2632 OF 2021

Smt. Lata Dadarao Pawar @ Smt.

Ayesha Amir Shaikh,

Aged about 48 years, Occu. Flower

Vendor and garment business,

Resident of Room No.27, Harbour Line,

Zopadpatii, Azad nagar, Mahim, Mumbai

...Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Maharashtra

Through the Principal Secretary, Home

Department, Government of

Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai –

400 032.

...Respondents

2.

Commissioner of Police, Railways, Area

Manager Building, 4th Floor, P Dmello

Road, Wadi Bunder, Mumbai – 400 010

3.

Assistant Commissioner of Police –

Dadar Division, Through Dadar Railway

Police Station, Mumbai.

Ms. Anjali Awasthi, for the Petitioner.

Mrs. M. H. Mhatre, APP for the State/Respondent.

CORAM:

S. S. SHINDE &

N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.

RESERVED ON:

5th AUGUST, 2021.

PRONOUNCED ON:

13th AUGUST, 2021.

JUDGMENT:- PER : N. J. JAMADAR, J.

1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and, with the

consent of the Counsels for the parties, heard fnally.

1/17

CRIWP2632-2021.DOC

2.

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

assails the legality and validity of the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top