HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
M. S. SONAK, R. N. LADDHA, JJ
PRAKASH @ PRASHANT PURSHOTTAM GAUNS DESSAI – Appellant
Versus
ADMINISTRATOR OF DEVALAYA/MAMLATDAR OF QUEPEM & 4 ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing of arguments from all counsel. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner seeks recovery from former committee. (Para 2) |
| 3. court stresses the need for executing recovery orders. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. court disposes of the petition with directions for recovery. (Para 5 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. emphasis on the statutory duties of public officials. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
ORAL ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. Chirag Angle, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. D. Pangam, learned Advocate General, and Ms. M. Correia, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent nos.1 & 2, and Mr. Parag Wagle, the learned Counsel, appears for respondents nos.3 & 5. For the order which we propose to make an appearance of respondent no.4, who is incidentally the President of respondent no.3, is not required. Further, we are quite surprised that a Counsel appears for respondent no.3 but states that he has no instructions to appear on behalf of respondent no.4.
2. The petitioner, who claims to be a member/Mazan of Shree Sateri Shantadurga Devalaya alias Sateri Gramdevi of Xeldom, a Devasthan which is governed and controlled under the Regulamento Das Mazania (Devasthan Regulation), seeks an appropriate writ requiring respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.