SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DAGDU TUKARAM TAKE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['KAKADE DEEPAK M', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'SHELKE SUNITA D', 'R/ SERVED', 'GP WAIVES OF R/ AND R']

1 920-10153-2021ca

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10153 OF 2021

IN FAST/23951/2016

DAGDU TUKARAM TAKE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, JALNAAND OTHERS

Mr D.M. Kakade, Advocate for the applicant

Mr A.B. Chate, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2/State

CORAM : SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 3rd February 2022

PER COURT :

1.

It is an application moved by the applicant with three-fold prayers - (1)

for condonation of delay, (2) for setting aside the order passed by this Court

dated 19th March, 2018, and (3) to restore the name of respondent No.3 in the

cause title of Appeal (Stamp) No. 23951/2016.

2.

Heard Mr Deepak Kakade, learned counsel for the applicant. He

submits that he could not supply the copies for service to respondent No.3 within

a stipulated period granted by the Court. Thus, failed to take effective steps

against respondent No. 3 and ultimately, appeal came to be dismissed against

respondent No. 3 for want of steps. He submitted that the participation of

respondent No.3/acquiring body is very much

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top