SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 9720

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
NAMDEV SHRIRAM SARWADE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['MULEY PRAMOD N', 'COPY SERVED ON P P', '', 'JAISWAL NIKHIL D']

1

17-ABA-826-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.826 OF 2022

NAMDEV SHRIRAM SARWADE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Pramod N. Muley

APP for Respondent No.1/State : Ms. V. S. Choudhari

Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Nikhil D. Jaiswal

...

CORAM :

S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE :

01-08-2022

Order :-

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, the learned APP

for the State, and the learned counsel for respondent No.2/victim.

2.

The applicant has a case that there were boundary disputes

in his family and the family of the victim. Therefore, false

allegations have been levelled against the applicant that he has

intentionally insulted the victim to humiliate her being a Scheduled

Caste member.

3.

The learned counsel for the applicant has argued that

considering the place of the incident as alleged, it cannot be said

that it is a place in public view. The prosecution has no case that

any person had witnessed the incident; therefore, prima facie

material does not warrant his arrest. Therefore, though there is a

2

17-ABA-826-22.od

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top