SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SHRIPAD PRABHAKARRAO DUDHAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['TALEKAR NAGESH G AND BHARAT PANKAJ A', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'GP', 'VIBHUTE VINOD M', 'R/ AND SERVED']

{1} WP 7884 OF 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

8 WRIT PETITION NO.7884 OF 2019

SHRIPAD PRABHAKARRAO DUDHAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.D.M.Mane h/f. Mr.Nagesh G. Talekar

AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Mr.P.N.Kutti

Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr.Vinod M. Vibhute

...

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.

DATE : 4th July, 2022

ORDER :-

.

This petition fled under Articles 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India challenges the order passed by the Chief

Executive Ofcere Zilla Parishade Osmanabade dated 12th Octobere

2018e thereby imposing punishment of stoppage of one

increment of the petitioner with permanent efect.

2.

The petitioner is working on the post of Assistant Teacher

with Zilla Parishade Osmanabad. The State Government by

issuing guidelines has laid down procedure for transfer of Zilla

Parishad employees. In the said Resolutione a provision is made

for special category of Teacherse who are sufering from certain

ailments mentioned in the guidelines.

3.

The petitioner applied online by claimin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top