Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MANGESH S. PATIL, J
Fr. Peter Thamaji Amolik – Appellant
Versus
The President, Saint Francis De-Sales Education Society (SFS School) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedures for appointment and charges against the headmaster. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding due process in the enquiry. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's observations on compliance and procedural integrity. (Para 14 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. assessment of misconduct and justification for termination. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 5. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 28 , 29) |
Heard. Rule. The Rule is made returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. Kadam waives service for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Learned A.G.P. waives service for the respondent No. 3. At the joint request of the parties the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission.
2. By invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner is challenging the judgment and order passed by the School Tribunal, Aurangabad dismissing his Appeal No. 10/2013 preferred under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 , (hereinafter ‘the MEPS Act’) dated 14.08.2014 against the order of his termination issued by the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
3. The petitioner was appointed by the respondent No.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
