SHRIKANT VITTHALRAO MUNDHE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
{1}
wp621020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.6210 OF 2020
Shrikant s/o Vitthalrao Mundhe
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.V.M.Maney, advocate for the petitioner.
Mrs.G.L.Deshpande, AGP for the Respondents.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 14th September, 2020.
PC :
1
The petitioner had challenged the order of
suspension before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal,
Bench at Aurangabad. The Original Application fled by the
petitioner is disposed of in view of the fact that the petitioner
had not availed alternate remedy.
2
Mr.Maney, learned Counsel for the petitioner, relying
on the following judgments submits that availability of alternate
remedy is not a bar for the Court to exercise its jurisdiction.
(i)
Whirlpool Corporation Vs. Registrar of Trade
Marks, Mumbai & others, AIR 1999 SC 22;
{2}
wp621020.odt
(ii)
M.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.