SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUDHIR MADHUKAR THAKUR AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


1 27-WP-3744-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 3744 OF 2020

Sudhir s/o Madhukar Thakur and Anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

Mr S.C. Yeramwar, Advocate for Petitioners

Mr K.N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondents-State

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA

AND

SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE : 9th MARCH, 2020

PER COURT :

1.

The petitioners seek caste certifcate in the Central

Government format.

2.

It is the contention of the petitioners that the

petitioners are already issued with the caste certifcate in the

State Government format. The subsequent application made for

issuance of caste certifcate in the Central Government format is

rejected probably on the ground that evidence is not submitted.

3.

According to the petitioners, the cousin uncle of the

petitioners is issued with the validity certifcate.

4.

We have heard the learned Assistant Government

Pleader also.

2 27-WP-3744-2020

5.

At the time of issuance of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top