SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. PATEL
FARAH FARROKH JIJINA – Appellant
Versus
NOSHIR JAMSHED LALA (CAVEATOR) – Respondent
IA/1837/2021



30-IA1837-2021 IN CST156-2019 WITH CST156-2019 IN CTS81-2019.DOC

Arun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1837 OF 2021

IN

CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 156 OF 2019

IN

TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 2189 OF 2018

(TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 110 OF 2021)

Farah Farrokh Jijina

…Applicant/

Petitioner

Versus

Noshir Jamshed Lala

…Caveator

CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 156 OF 2019

IN

CAVEAT NO. 81 OF 2019

IN

TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 2189 OF 2018

Noshir Jamshed Lala

…Applicant

In the matter between

Farah Farrokh Jijina

...Petitioner

Versus

Noshir Jamshed Lala

…Caveator

Mr Vishal Kanade,i/b Siganporia & Dalvi, for Petitioner &

Applicant

in IA/1837/2021.

Mr A Davar, with Ms Kirti Ojha, i/b Udwadia & Co, for Caveator &

Page 1 of 5

8th October 2021

ARUN

RAMCHNDRA

SANKPAL

Digitally signed by

ARUN RAMCHNDRA

SANKPAL

Date: 2021.10.11

17:14:55 +0530

30-IA1837-2021 IN CST156-2019 WITH CST156-2019 IN CTS81-2019.DOC

Applicant in CST/156/2019.

CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J

DATED: 8th October 2021

PC:-

1.

The Interim Application and the Chamber Summons can be

disposed of thus.

2.

Interim Application No. 1837 of 2021 seeks a discharge or

dismissal of the Caveat. Mr Kanade appears for the Petitioner.

3.

The Interim Application may be a little premature.

4.

There is a Chamber Summons No. 156 of 2019 which seeks to

condone a delay of 113 days in filing the Affidavit in Support.

Obviously, Mr Kanade’s application for discharge of the Caveat

cannot be taken up unless there is a proper Caveat to begin with, i.e.

until the delay is condoned. Instead of going down this road, Mr

Kanade submits that the delay may be condoned. The Petition may

be directed to be renumbered as a Suit, and directions be issued for a

quick and early trial. That is eminently reasonable.

5.

The delay is condoned. The Affidavit in Support of the

Caveat is to be filed in the registry. The Interim Application for

discharge of the Caveat is dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn.

Both the Interim Application and the Chamber Summons are

disposed of in these terms. No costs.

Page 2 of 5

8th October 2021

30-IA1837-2021 IN CST156-2019 WITH CST156-2019 IN CTS81-2019.DOC

6.

Consequently, the Testamentary Petition is now to be

renumbered as a Suit and has to be taken for framing issues.

7.

In the spirit of things, I will now proceed to do frame issues

immediately.

8.

The Registry will renumber the Suit by Monday, 11th October

2021 so that the orders can be uploaded correctly.

9.

Issues are framed and these are appended to this order.

10. The Plaintiff shall, on or before 22nd November 2021, file (i)

the affidavit(s) of the attesting witness(es) (ii) the evidence affidavit

of the Plaintiff; (iii) an affidavit of documents; and (iv) a compilation

of documents duly indexed and paginated. Copies of each of these

will be served on the advocates for the Defendant on or before that

date.

11. If the Plaintiff does not comply by that or by such date as may

be extended by an order of the Court on the application made by the

Plaintiff, the Plaintiff may be deemed to have closed his case.

12. Once the Plaintiff has completed these filings, discovery and

inspection will be complete within one week thereafter.

Page 3 of 5

8th October 2021

30-IA1837-2021 IN CST156-2019 WITH CST156-2019 IN CTS81-2019.DOC

13. Suit to be listed for directions on 6th December 2021 for

marking the Plaintiffs’ documents.

14. All concerned will act on production of a digitally signed copy

of this order.

(G. S. PATEL, J)

Page 4 of 5

8th October 2021

30-IA1837-2021 IN CST156-2019 WITH CST156-2019 IN CTS81-2019.DOC

ISSUES FRAMED ON 8TH OCTOBER 2021

TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 110 OF 2021

IN

TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 2189 OF 2018

Farah Farrokh Jijina

…Plaintiff

Versus

Noshir Jamshed Lala

…Defendant

1.

Whether the Plaintiff proves that the writing dated 6th May

2001 was duly and validly executed and attested in

accordance with law as the Last Will and Testament of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top