SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KHANNA SINGH KALYANI AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


: 1 :

47-ba-181-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 181 OF 2021

1. Khanna Singh Kalyani

2. Pilli Singh Kalyani

.... Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

.... Respondent

_____

Mr. Subhash Jha a/w. Hare Krishna Mishra i/b. Law Global

Advocates for Applicants.

Smt. A. A. Takalkar, APP for State/Respondent.

_____

CORAM :SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE

:06th APRIL, 2021

P.C. :

1.

The Applicants are seeking their release on bail in

connection with C.R.No. 205 of 2020 registered at Yerwada police

station, Pune city, under sections 307, 385, 387, 324, 143, 147,

148, 427 r/w. 149 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘

IPC’) and

under sections 4 and 25 of Indian Arms Act.

2.

Heard Shri. Subhash Jha, learned counsel for the

applicants and Smt. Takalkar, learned APP for the State.

3.

The First Information Report (for short ‘

F.I.R.’) is

1 of 5

Gokhale

: 2 :

47-ba-181-21.odt

lodged by the injured Kundansingh Bawari himself. He has stated

that, on 24/02/2020 the applicant No.1 called him telephonically

and demanded Rs.1 lakh as extortion money. The informant

expressed his inability to pay t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top