SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MONIKA RAJENRA MHASKE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['Salunke V D', 'Adv A B Kadethankar', 'waives', '', 'Adv S E Shekade', 'V P Filed', 'R NO SERVED', 'R NO SERVED']

1 wp 101&102.2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

1017 WRIT PETITION NO. 101 OF 2021

MONIKA RAJENDRA MHASKE

VERSUS

THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND OTHERS

...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Salunke V. D.

Standing Counsel for Respondents No. 1 & 2:

Mr. A. B. Kadethankar

Advocate for Respondents No.3 & 4: Mr. V. D.

Sapkal, Senior Advocate h/f. Mr. S. E. Shekade

...

1018 WRIT PETITION NO. 102 OF 2021

REKHA DEEPAK JATAL

VERSUS

THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND OTHERS

...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Salunke V. D.

Standing Counsel for Respondents No. 1 & 2:

Mr. A. B. Kadethankar

Advocate for Respondents No.3 & 4: Mr. V. D.

Sapkal, Senior Advocate h/f. Mr. S. E. Shekade

...

CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA &

SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE: 14th JANUARY, 2021

PER COURT:

1.

To avoid rigmarole both these writ petitions

are decided together and the facts are taken from

Writ Petition No. 101 of 2021.

2 wp 101&102.2021

2.

The petitioner had filled in the nomination

form for the election of the post of Member of

Grampanchayat from Ward No. 3B and Ward No. 3C.

The nomination

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top