SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
N.J. JAMADAR, J
Mr.Sanjay Damodar Kale – Appellant
Versus
Ms.Kalyani Sanjay Kale – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.Seema Sarnaik
For the Respondents: Mr.Hitesh P. Vyas, Mrs.M.H. Mhatre

JUDGMENT :

1. The challenge in this Revision Application is to the judgment and order dated 7th February, 2019 passed by Judge, Family Court No. 2, Pune in Petition No.E-102 of 2016, whereby the learned Judge was persuaded to order payment of an amount of Rs.15,000/- per month to the Respondent-wife from the date of application and an amount of Rs.7,000/- as cost of litigation under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (“the Code”).

2. For the sake of convenience and clarity, the parties are hereinafter referred to in the capacity in which they were arraigned before the learned Judge, Family Court.

3. Shorn of the necessary details the background facts leading to this Application can be stated as under: The marriage of the Applicant was solemnized with the Respondent on 12th November, 1997 in accordance with Hindu religious rites and ceremonies. The Applicant claimed, since inception of marital life the Respondent treated the Applicant with extreme cruelty. The Applicant was subjected to harassment in order to coerce her to meet unlawful demands. The Respondent had dropped the Applicant at her parental home at Satara in the month of January, 1999. Despite repeated assura

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top