Raju B. Vaswani vs State of Maharashtra and others

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

ORIGINAL SIDE,BOMBAY
Ujjal Bhuyan, J
Raju B. Vaswani – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Vincent D'Silva
For the Respondents:Mr. Amit Shastri, AGP for Respondent No.1-State, Mr. Kedar Purav for Respondent Nos.2 to 4, Mr. C. K. Tripathi for Respondent Nos.5 to 7

Table of Content
1. history of property ownership and agreements (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. petitioner's claim and actions on the property (Para 6 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. respondents assert cancellation of power of attorney and subsequent sale to third party. (Para 16 , 17)
4. court analysis of document legitimacy and lawful procedure. (Para 19 , 20)
5. legal validity of documents and transfer rights (Para 24 , 28 , 30)

ORDER:

Heard Mr. Vincent D'Silva, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Amit Shastri, learned AGP for respondent No.1-State; Mr. Kedar Purav, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4; and Mr. C. K. Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 to 7.

2. By filing this petition under Articles 226 and and 227 of the Constitution of India , petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:

1. To set aside and quash order dated 12.02.2019 passed by respondent No.4 i.e., Estate Manager-1, Konkan Housing and Area Development Board;

2. To declare that the property admeasuring about 120 square metres covered by plot No.177 of Survey No.29A situated at Alibaug, District Raigad in the State of Maharashtra is lawfully transferred and regularized in the name of the petitioner and that petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

ORIGINAL SIDE,BOMBAYUjjal Bhuyan, JRaju B. Vaswani – AppellantVersusState of Maharashtra and others – Respondent

ORIGINAL SIDE,BOMBAY
Ujjal Bhuyan, J
Raju B. Vaswani – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent