SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
M. S. SONAK, J
M/s. Viraj Properties – Appellant
Versus
Parmanand H. Thakkar and ors. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Dr. Birendra Saraf, Mr. Subhash Jadhav, Mr.Yakshay Chheda, Ms Warisha Parkar

ORAL JUDGMENT. :-

1] Heard Mr. Birendra Saraf and Mr. Yakshay Chheda learned counsel for the applicant.

2] On 22nd June 2016, this Court made the following order:

“. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant.

2 By this Civil Revision Application, the applicant defendant no.2 challenges the order dated 14.12.2015 passed by Addl. Judge, Small Causes Court and Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune below Exh. 62 in Special Civil Suit No. 404 of 2013 allowing respondent's plaintiff's application under Order 12 Rule 8 of Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 directing defendant no.2 to produce the original documents as stated in paragraph 6 of the impugned order.

3 The learned counsel for the defendant no.2 submits that they have no objection to place on record the certified copies of those documents.

4 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and statement made by him during the course of arguments, I am satisfied that applicant has made out case for following order:

a) Office is directed to issue notice before admission to the Respondents, returnable on 01.08.2016.

b) In addition to usual mode of service, the Applicant is permitted to serve the Respondents by way of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top