SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
DR.TARACHAND KADTUJI KAMBALE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['R M DESHMUKH', 'Y P TAWAR', '', 'D Y TAWAR', 'COPY SERVED ON P P']

Cri.Appeal.339-2002.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.339 OF 2002

Dr. Tarachand Kadtuji Kambale,

Age : 50 years, Medical Officer,

at present residing at 157,

Dattatraya Nagar,

Nagpur

..Appellant

Vs.

State of Maharashtra

..Respondent

----

Mr. R.M.Deshmukh, Advocate for appellant

Mr. S.M.Ganachari, APP for respondent

----

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J.

DATE : JULY 10, 2019

JUDGMENT :-

The challenge in this appeal is to the

judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated

15.06.2002 passed by the Special Court, Dhule, in

Special Case No.74 of 1997. By the impugned judgment

and order, the appellant came to be convicted of the

offence punishable under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read

with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,

1988 (for short, “P.C.Act”) and sentenced to suffer

2

Cri.Appeal.339-2002

rigorous imprisonment for one year with fine of

Rs.500/- and rigorous imprisonment for two years with

fine of Rs.1,000/-, respectively. He is, therefore,

in appeal before this Court.

2.

The facts giving rise to the prosecution

case are as follows :-

Subhash Potdar (PW

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top