Mahaguj Collieries Limited vs Adani Enterprises Limited

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
B. P. Colabawalla, J
Mahaguj Collieries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Adani Enterprises Limited – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Ms. Sneha Phene, Mr. Jayendra Kapadia, Mr. Fozan Lakdawala, Ms. Varsha Agarwal, Ms. Janvi Manek
For the Respondents: Mr. Vikram Nankani, Mr. Ashishchandra Rao, Mr. Abhileen Chaturvedi, Mr. Dhruv Jain

Table of Content
1. factual basis of the arbitration. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments regarding enforcement and claims. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. court's reasoning on interim relief. (Para 14 , 15 , 19)
4. assessment of the tribunal's decisions. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
5. legal standards for interim measures. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
6. final order on the petitions. (Para 25)

ORAL JUDGMENT:-

1. Admit. By consent of the parties, both the arbitration petitions are taken up for hearing and final disposal.

2. Both these petitions have been filed by the petitioner under 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short (cid:210)the Act(cid:211)) challenging the order passed by the Arbitral Tribunal dated 19th March, 2018 (for short (cid:210)the impugned order(cid:211)) under which the interim reliefs sought for by the petitioner herein was rejected and the interim relief sought for by the respondent herein was partially granted. The petitioner is the respondent before the arbitral Tribunal. The respondent herein is the claimant. For the sake of convenience, I shall refer to the parties as they were arrayed before the Arbitral Tribunal.

3. By Arbitration Petition No. 681 of 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

BOMBAY HIGH COURTB. P. Colabawalla, JMahaguj Collieries Limited – AppellantVersusAdani Enterprises Limited – Respondent

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
B. P. Colabawalla, J
Mahaguj Collieries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Adani Enterprises Limited – Respondent