ORAL ORDER :-

1. On hearing Mr Sharad S. Solanke, the learned counsel for the petitioner at length, he seeks adjournment. We would not have rejected the prayer for adjournment but, considering the peculiar facts, we are not inclined to accept the prayer for adjournment on two grounds namely, the instant PIL is circulated by claiming urgency when there was no real urgency in the matter and on perusal of the grievance raised in the PIL and the documents annexed thereto, we are of the opinion that, the PIL is devoid of merits.

2. The petitioner claims to be a social worker and it is submitted before us that the petitioner is an elected member of Municipal Council at Majalgaon, Tq. Majalgaon, Dist. Beed. The prayer clause 'B', whereby the petitioner seeks directions against respondent/authority to take action against respondent Nos. 7 to 9, reads as under:

B] Issue writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of