SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANDIP JANKIRAM LOKHANDE – Appellant
Versus
HUSSAIN KHAN ALIYAR KHAN AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['LATANGE V P', 'JOSHI SUMIT S AND S H JOSHI', '', 'Shaikh Mujtaba Gulam Mustafa', 'R/ TO', 'R', '', 'SERVED', 'PATHAN HAMZAKHAN I', 'SINGARE RAMDAS B', 'SINGARE RAMDAS B', '']

1 wp 484.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 484 OF 2015

Sandip Jankiram Lokhande

.. Petitioner

Versus

Hussain Khan Aliyar Khan and others

.. Respondents

Shri B. S. Shinde, Advocate h/f Shri V. P. Latange, Advocate for

the Petitioner.

Shri Quadri Taher Ali, Advocate h/f Shri Shaikh Mujitaba

Gulam Mustafa, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1.

Shri S. H. Joshi, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.

Shri H. I. Pathan, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3.

Shri R. B. Shingare, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 to 8.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

DATE : 13TH DECEMBER, 2017.

FINAL ORDER :

.

Mr. Shinde, the learned advocate for the petitioner submits

that, the order passed by the Trial Court directing payment of

Court fees upon consideration mentioned in the sale deed is

erroneous. The petitioner was seeking declaration that the sale

deed is not binding on him and was not seeking relief of

cancellation. As such, was not required to pay ad-valorem court

fees. The petitioner was not executant of the said document. The

learned advocate relies on the judgment of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top