Advocates:
['KIRIT J HAKANI', 'RAJESH MORE', '', 'M/S YKS LEGAL']

-1-

IN

IN

IN

THE

THE

THE

HIGH

COURT

OF

JUDICATURE

AT

BOMBAY

HIGH

COURT

OF

JUDICATURE

AT

BOMBAY

HIGH

COURT

OF

JUDICATURE

AT

BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY

TESTAMENTARY

TESTAMENTARY

AND

AND

AND

INTESTATE

JURISDICTION

INTESTATE

JURISDICTION

INTESTATE

JURISDICTION

MISCELLANEOUS

MISCELLANEOUS

MISCELLANEOUS

PETITION

PETITION

PETITION

NO.79

OF

2005

NO.79

OF

2005

NO.79

OF

2005

The

Administrator

General,

Maharashtra State, Mumbai

...Petitioner

v/s

Mr Ambarish Satish Pandit

...Deceased

Mr

Kirit

J.

Hakani

for

Petitioner.

CORAM

:

D.K.

DESHMUKH

J.

DATE

:

7TH

JUNE

2007.

-2-

P.C.

:-

1.

Petition is granted in terms of prayer clauses

(a)

to

(c)

and

(e).

So

far

as

the

prayer

clause

(a)

is

concerned,

it

is

clarified

that

in

Exh.’B’

to

the

petition,

first

property

mentioned

is

Flat

No.6,

Rachana

Regency,

C.T.S.

No.1098/9B,

Model

Colony,

Shivaji

Nagar,

Pune

411

016.

From

the

material

on

record,

it

appears

that

the

sale

deed

of

that

property

has

been

executed

in

favour

of

the

respondent