BOMBAY HIGH COURT - ORIGINAL SIDE,BOMBAY
THE ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL – Appellant
Versus
THE PR.and SR.MASTER.H.C.,(O.S.),BOMBAY THE COSMOS CO.OP.BANK LTD – Respondent
MPT 79/2005
['KIRIT J HAKANI', 'RAJESH MORE', '', 'M/S YKS LEGAL']
-1-
IN
IN
IN
THE
THE
THE
HIGH
COURT
OF
JUDICATURE
AT
BOMBAY
HIGH
COURT
OF
JUDICATURE
AT
BOMBAY
HIGH
COURT
OF
JUDICATURE
AT
BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY
TESTAMENTARY
TESTAMENTARY
AND
AND
AND
INTESTATE
JURISDICTION
INTESTATE
JURISDICTION
INTESTATE
JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS
MISCELLANEOUS
MISCELLANEOUS
PETITION
PETITION
PETITION
NO.79
OF
2005
NO.79
OF
2005
NO.79
OF
2005
The
Administrator
General,
Maharashtra State, Mumbai
...Petitioner
v/s
Mr Ambarish Satish Pandit
...Deceased
Mr
Kirit
J.
Hakani
for
Petitioner.
CORAM
:
D.K.
DESHMUKH
J.
DATE
:
7TH
JUNE
2007.
-2-
P.C.
:-
1.
Petition is granted in terms of prayer clauses
(a)
to
(c)
and
(e).
So
far
as
the
prayer
clause
(a)
is
concerned,
it
is
clarified
that
in
Exh.’B’
to
the
petition,
first
property
mentioned
is
Flat
No.6,
Rachana
Regency,
C.T.S.
No.1098/9B,
Model
Colony,
Shivaji
Nagar,
Pune
411
016.
From
the
material
on
record,
it
appears
that
the
sale
deed
of
that
property
has
been
executed
in
favour
of
the
respondent
-
Ashpak
Karim
Khan.
The
question
whether
the
title
to
the
property
has
validly
passed
to
the
said
Ashpak
Karim
Khan
cannot
be
decided
in
these
proceedings.
Therefore,
liberty
is
granted
to
the
petitioner
to
institute
appropriate
proceedings
in
appropriate
Court
in
relation
to
that
property.
It
is
clarified
that
till
the
appropriate
Court
so
decides,
the
respondent
-
Ashpak
Karim
Khan
can
continue
to
hold
the
said
property
and
the
Administrator
General
shall
not
interfere
with
the
same.
However,
the
respondent
-
Ashpak
Karim
Khan
is
directed
that
he
shall
not
deal
with,
transfer,
alienate
or
part
with
possession
of
the
said
property
for
a
period
of
twelve
weeks
from
today.
Petition
is
disposed
off.
It
is
clarified
that
the
appropriate
authority
to
which
the
petitioner
would
approach
in
relation
to
the
aforesaid
flat,
shall
decide
those
proceedings
on
their
own
merits
-3-
without being influenced by the fact that this Court has
made an interim order in relation to the said property.
.
Parties to act on the copy of this order duly
authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary as
true copy.
.
Certified copy expedited.
-----------