TAMIZ HUSSAIN TAYYAB HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL SATTAR SHAIKH GULAB – Respondent
1
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
SECOND APPEAL No. 321 OF 2006
Tamiz Hussain s/o Tayyab Husain
v.
Abdul Sattar s/o Sk. Gulab
_______________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram
appearances, Court's orders or directions
Court's or Judge's orders
and Registrar's orders
Mr.Tanveer Iqbal Advocate for the appellant.
....
CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J.
DATED : 29
h OCTOBER, 2007.
Heard learned counsel for the
appellant.
Concurrent findings of fact
recorded by the courts below are put to
challenge in this second appeal. Both the
courts below have recorded a finding that the
appellant/plaintiff failed to prove ownership
over the suit property which was claimed
under the oral gift-deed alleged to have been
made by one Jamilabi. The trial court upon
appreciation of evidence dismissed the suit.
The appellate court in its judgment in para 16
2
has held as under :
“I am very much afraid
whether the evidence of this material
witness satisfies the requirements of oral
gift of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.