1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11419 OF 2011

IN FAST/16958/2011

WITH

CA/11415/2011 IN FAST/16994/2011

WITH

CA/11417/2011 IN FAST/16989/2011

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

VERSUS

VIJAYKUMAR SHANKARRAO INGALE AND ANR

...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr.VP Kadam, AGP.

-----

CORAM :

K.K.TATED, J.

DATE :

2 ^nd September,2014.

PER COURT :

1)

Heard learned AGP for applicants.

2)

These Civil Applications are preferred by

original respondent/State of Maharashtra for stay of

operation and implementation of impugned Judgment and

Award dated 6.1.2010 passed by the Reference Court in

LARs, awarding enhanced compensation in respect of

acquired lands.

3)

Learned AGP submits that if the entire

amount is recovered by the respondents in Execution

application, nothing will survive in these

applications. He submits that in the interest of

justice, impugned order be stayed during pendency of

present First Appeals.

4)

I have heard learned AGP for applicant.

Considering the submissions made by learned AGP for

2

applicant and after going through the impugned

judgment, it is correct