Advocates:
['PINGALE DURGESH M', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'G P', 'R/ SERVED', 'A G MAGARE', 'R S WANI AND S P WANI']

WP/7759/2013

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 7759 OF 2013

CHOTU FATRU PINJARI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

...

Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Pingale Durgesh M

AGP for Respondents 1 to 3 : Shri Dighe V.H.

Advocate for Respondent 4 : Shri Wani S.P.

...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated: April 02, 2014

...

PER COURT :-

1.

Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties.

2.

The controversy before this Court has boiled down to

a specific objection raised by the petitioner while

opposing RTS Appeal No.24 of 2012 before the Additional

Collector, Nandurbar.

Respondent No.4 herein had

preferred the said appeal.

3.

The petitioner while submitting his written say, had

raised a specific objection in clause (2) stating that in

light of the facts of the case and the law under which

the original proceedings are pending, the RTS Appeal was

not maintainable under Sections 247 and 257 of the

Maharashtra Land Revenue Code ("MLRC").

WP/7759/2013

2

4.

The limited grievance of the petitioner is that

having raised this objection, specifically in his written

say, dated 18.9.2012, a pray