NOORA DEVIDAS BHOSALE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAH – Respondent
APEAL 580/2012
Cri. Appeal No. 580/12 & Ors.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 580 OF 2012
Noora s/o. Devidas Bhosale,
Age 31 years, Occu. At present in
Jail, R/o. Karjat, Tal. Karjat,
Dist. Ahmednagar.
....Appellant.
Versus
State of Maharashtra
Through the Karjat Police Station,
Karjat, Dist. Ahmednagar.
....Respondent.
Mr. H.D. Deshmukh, Advocate for appellant.
Mrs. V.A. Shinde, APP for State.
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 592 OF 2012
Gorakh Narayan Bhosale,
Age 31 years, R/o. Vahera,
Tq. Ashti, Dist. Beed.
....Appellant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
....Respondent.
Mr. Rajendra N. Chavan h/f. Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate for
appellant.
Mrs. V.A. Shinde, APP for State.
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 375 OF 2013
Cri. Appeal No. 580/12 & Ors.
2
Navnath @ Andya s/o. Devidas Bhosale,
Prisoner No. C.16423, Confined
In Yerwada Central Prison, Pune-6
....Appellant.
Versus
State of Maharashtra
Through the Karjat Police Station,
Karjat, Dist. Ahmednagar.
....Respondent.
Mr. Shaikh Ashpak Taher Patel, Advocate for appellant (appointed).
Mrs. V.A. Shinde, APP for State.
CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J.
DATED : 25th November, 2013
JUDGMENT :
1.
All the appeals are filed against the judgment and
order of Sessions Case No. 96/2011, which was pending in the
Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar. From the case,
accused Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 7 are convicted and sentenced for
offences punishable under sections 396, 457 and 380 of Indian
Penal Code. The maximum substantive sentence of ten years is
given, which is for the offence punishable under section 396 of
I.P.C. and for offence under each section the fine of Rs. 5,000/- is
imposed on each of the accused. Navnath (accused No. 2) has
filed Criminal Appeal No. 375/2013, Gorakh (accused No. 3) has
filed Criminal Appeal No. 592/2012 and Noora (accused No. 5) has
Cri. Appeal No. 580/12 & Ors.
3
filed Criminal Appeal No. 580/2012. Accused No. 7 has not filed
any appeal. Both the sides are heard.
2.
In short, the facts leading to the institution of the
appeal can be stated as follows :-
The incident took place on the night between
27.11.2010 and 28.11.2010 in the locality known as Langore Galli,
Karjat, District Ahmednagar. The houses of deceased Ashok
Langore, Satish Jadhav, Vilas Mahajan and Anaspure are situated
in that locality and these houses were broken on that night and
the offence of dacoity was committed. In the house of Ashok, two
murders were committed. The deceased Ashok was cousin of
complainant Ramesh and the house of Ramesh is also situated in
the same locality.
3.
The wife of Ashok was out of station. The old mother
of Ashok and his sister Pramila were present in the house along
with Ashok on that night. Satish Jadhav was out of station and he
had put lock on his house, when he had left the station. Other
persons were at home.
4.
On that night, the dacoits broke open the houses of
Cri. Appeal No. 580/12 & Ors.
4
aforesaid persons and they took away valuables like ornaments
and bags containing articles. When the complainant visited the
house of Ashok, Ashok was already dead. Pramila was seriously
injured and she succumbed to the injuries in the hospital. On the
basis of report given by Ramesh, the crime was registered for
offences punishable under sections 380, 396 etc. of I.P.C. in Karjat
Police Station at C.R. No. 223/2010.
5.
Annasaheb Ghavte, the P.S.I., who was attached to
the aforesaid police station made some investigation. When he
prepared the spot panchanama in the house of Ashok, he found
one rexine wallet. The complainant and others told that the wallet
was not of family members of Ashok. In the wallet, there were
receipts of census of the Government and the receipts were
bearing in the name of Devidas Dinya Bhosle (accused No. 7).
There was one passport size photograph of accused No. 7 in the
wallet. Vishal Mahajan informed that a bag of his