SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 76

DAMODHAR HIMTAJI DONGRE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['SOLANKE SHRIKRASHNA B', 'COPY SERVED ON PP', '', 'PP']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.261 OF 2014 Damodhar s/o. Himtaji Dongre, Age 71 years, Occ. Labour, R/o. Hingni (Bk.), Tq. Dharur, Dist. Beed ..Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Dindrud, Tq. Dharur, Dist. Beed ..Respondent --

Mr.S.B.Solanke, advocate for appellant Mr.S.R.Palnitkar, APP for respondent - State --

CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : AUGUST 12, 2015

ORAL JUDGMENT :

Heard both sides.

2] The appellant, who is convicted by learned Addl. Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Majalgaon in Sessions Case No.47 of 2013, vide judgment and order dated 10th April, 2014, for the offences punishable under Section 376 read with 511 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (for short, “POCSO Act”) and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years on account of offence punishable under Section 376 read with 511 of Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of POCSO Act; and for three years on account of offence punishable under Section 8 of POCSO Act, with a direction to pay fine, has preferred present appeal.

3] The prosecution case would re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top