BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SHRINIWAS PRABHAKAR KARVE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 2345/2015
['Kulkarni Suresh M', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', 'GP FOR R/1 & 2', 'R 3 TO 5 SERVED', '`']
1
WP No.2345/2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2345/2015
Shriniwas s/o Prabhakar Karve,
Age: 57 years, occu. Service,
R/o. Hotel Ashwamedh, Aurangpura,
Aurangabad.
.. Petitioner
VERSUS
1.
The State of Maharashtra,
Through Chief Secretary,
Maharashtra State,
Mantralaya, Mumbai.
2.
Principle Secretary,
Tribal Development Department
Mantralaya, Mumbai -32.
3.
Principle Secretary,
The Finance Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.
4.
Principle Secretary,
General Administration Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai -32.
5.
Accountant General,
Maharshi Karve Road,
Mumbai.
.. Respondents
WITH
CONTEMP PETITION NO.716 OF 2015
Shriniwas s/o Prabhakar Karve,
Age: 57 years, occu. Service,
R/o. Hotel Ashwamedh, Aurangpura,
Aurangabad.
.. Petitioner
VERSUS
1.
Shri Swadhin Kshatriya,
Age : 58 years, Occu. Service,
Chief Secretary, Mantralaya,
2
WP No.2345/2015
Mumbai -32.
2.
Shri Rajgopal Devra,
Age: 52 years, Occu. Service,
Secretary, Tribal Dev. Dept.
Mantralaya, Mumbai -32.
3.
Shri Sambhaji Madhukar Sarkunde,
Age:59 years, Occu. Service,
Commissioner, Tribal Research and
Training Institute,
28, Queen's Garden, Pune -1.
.. Respondents
...
Mr.Suresh M. Kulkarni, Advocate for Petitioner;
Mr.S.B.Yawalkar, AGP for Respondents / State.
-----
CORAM :
R.M.BORDE &
P.R.BORA,JJ.
DATE OF RESERVING JUDGMENT : 22
nd March, 2016.
DATE OF PRONOUNCING JUDGMENT 22
nd APRIL,2016
JUDGMENT (PER:-P.R.BORA,J.)
1)
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and
heard finally with consent of the learned Counsel
for the parties.
2)
The present petition illustrates the
harassment suffered by a gazetted officer because
of the indifferent and callous attitude and
approach of the Government officials, in getting
corrected his date of birth, which was wrongly
3
WP No.2345/2015
recorded in his service book, without any fault
on his part,
3)
The petitioner was selected through MPSC
as a lecturer and joined his services in the year
1984. At the relevant time, the Service Books of
the Gazetted officers used to be retained by the
office of the Accountant General of Maharashtra.
The said practice suffered change in the year
1989 and the Service books were then transferred
to the parent department from 1991 onwards. It
is the specific case of the present petitioner
throughout that after the service books were
transfered to the parent department, the
petitioner came to know that his date of birth
has been wrongly recorded in the service book as
1st March, 1957 instead of 16th January, 1958.
4)
After being aware of the mistake so
occurred, the petitioner promptly filed a
representation on 4th February, 1993 with the
department for recording his correct date of
4
WP No.2345/2015
birth in the service book. However, nothing was
done for years together and the date of birth of
the petitioner remained as 1st March 1957.
5)
As has been contended by the petitioner,
since in all other record including the seniority
lists prepared in the year 1984, and thereafter
his date of birth was correctly recorded as 16th
January, 1958 and as no such occasion arose which
would have caused any adverse effect on the
service career or future prospects of the
petitioner because of wrong date of birth
recorded in his service book, the petitioner did
not that zealously pursued the representation
submitted by him way back in the year 1993,
seeking correction in his date of birth.
6)
However, after waiting for a long period
when nothing was communicated to him, the
petitioner moved another application on 22nd
September,
2009,requesting
the
respondents/authorities to record his correct
5
WP No.2345/2015
date of birth in the service record. In the said
representation the petitioner referred to his
earlier representation dated 4th February, 1993
a