BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
VILAS GANAPATRAO GATADE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
APPLN 2555/2008
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
Criminal Application No.2555 of 2008
Vilas Ganapatrao Gatade
Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent
Mr.P.R.Arjunwadkar for applicant.
Mr.K.V.Saste, APP for State.
CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J.
Oct
P.C.
.
Heard Mr.Arjunwadkar, learned counsel for the
applicant and Mr. Saste, learned APP.
.
The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in
C.R.
No.I-71
of
2008
of
Laxmipuri
Police
Station,
Kolhapur.
The
said
crime
has
been
registered
against
the
applicant
and
twenty
one
others
for
having
allegedly
committed
an
offence
punishable
under Sections 177, 403, 405, 406, 409, 415, 416,
417, 420, 463, 465, 467, 468 and 477(A) of IPC.
.
The applicant was one of the Directors of
Shri
Basweshwar
Co-operative
Credit
Society,
Kolhapur
from
1/4/1999
to
14/8/2004.
I
have
perused
the
FIR
dated
8/7/2008
lodged
by
the
Special
Auditor,
Class-I,
Co-operative
Society
(Sugar),
2
Sangli.
In
pursuance
of
the
order
dated
18/8/2007
issued
by
the
Special
Auditor,
Co-operative
Society,
Kolhapur,
the
test
audit
of
the
Credit
Society
was
conducted
for
the
period
between
1/4/2005
to
31/3/2006.
During
this
period
accused
nos.1
to
16
were
the
Directors,
whereas
accused
nos.17
to
19
were
Managers
and
accused
nos.20
to
22
were
working
as
Branch
Managers.
It
is
alleged
that
during
this
period
several
illegalities
/
irregularities
were
committed
in
the
banking
operations
by
all
the
accused
persons
which
caused
loss
to
the
said
Credit
Society
of
Rs.4.16
crores.
It
is
alleged
that
the
members
of
the
Board
of
Directors
of
the
said
Credit
Society
while
disbursing
the
loans
did
not
consider
the
capacity
of
borrowers,
details
of
mortgage,
capacity
of
repayment
of
loan
and
value
of
the
mortgaged
property
etc.
and
they
accepted
the
guarantee
of
the
persons
who
were
not
in
existence
and
thereby
caused
huge
loss
to
the
said
society.
So
far
as
the
present
applicant
is
concerned,
it
is
alleged
that
21
loans
of
Rs.194.90
lakhs
were
given
to
his
relatives
prior
to
1999
without
verifying
their
capacity
of
repayment
and
without
verifying
the
documents
submitted
by
them
by
way
of
security.
The
applicant
was
instrumental
in
granting
those
3
loans.
According
to
the
prosecution
the
total
sum
outstanding
with
agreed
rate
of
interest
against
the
relatives
of
the
applicant
as
of
today
is
almost
four
crores.
Till
filing
of
the
FIR
hardly
Rs.95
lakhs were paid by the relatives of the applicant
against 21 loan accounts.
.
On the last date of hearing Mr.Mundargi,
learned
Senior
Advocate
had
appeared
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
and
had
made
a
statement
before
this
Court
that
the
applicant
was
prepared
to
secure
the
outstanding
loan
amount
by
either
depositing
the
substantial
amount
or
by
furnishing
bank
guarantee.
Today
there
is
no
positive
response
forthcoming
from
the
applicant
in
order
to
secure
the
amount
outstanding against 21 loan accounts of his
relatives.
.
Today, once again, Mr. Arjunwadkar, learned
counsel
for
the
applicant
took
me
through
the
entire
material
placed
before
this
Court.
Upon
perusal
of
the
said
material
on
record,
I
am
satisfied
that
the
offence
in
the
present
case,
as
disclosed
in
the
FIR,