PRAKASH RAJARAM PATIL – Appellant
Versus
THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER, NASHIK DIVISION AND ORS – Respondent
1 wp 7940.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7940 OF 2012
Prakash Rajaram Patil
.. Petitioner
Versus
The Additional Commissioner,
Nashik Division and others
.. Respondents
Shri R. V. Gore, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri N. B. Patil, A.G.P. for Respondents/State.
Shri S. S. Thombre, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 to 6.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.
DATE : 03RD DECEMBER, 2013.
PER COURT :
.
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that, the
respondent No. 5 is dead. In view of that, the challenge of the
judgment to the extent of respondent No. 5 does not survive.
2.
Heard the learned counsel. The present petitioner had
filed an application for disqualification of the present respondent
Nos. 4 to 6 on the ground of, (i) non payment of tax due and (ii)
the respondent No. 4 not holding monthly meetings.
2 wp 7940.12
3.
The Additional Collector allowed the application and
disqualified the respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6. The respondent Nos.
4, 5 and 6 preferred an appeal before the Commissioner. The
s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.