SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

CHHOTU BALIRAM SONAWANE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAH – Respondent


1

crap305.12

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 305 OF 2012

Shri Chhotu Baliram Sonawane

...Applicant

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

.....

Shri Shrikant S. Patil, advocate for the applicant

Shri S.B.Pulkundwar, A.P.P. for respondent

.....

CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J.

DATED : 22.03.2012.

PER COURT :-

1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Perused the charge sheet and the documents

accompanying the charge sheet.

3.

After celebrative engagement, the applicant had

entered into physical relationship with the informant,

representing that she is almost his wife but for

marriage and did this for long many days. Later on, as

averred in the first information report, over dowry

related demand, the applicant has inhumanly breached

the ties.

2

crap305.12

4.

Crime No.168 of 2008 is registered at Dhule City

police station, Taluka and District Dhule for the

offences punishable under Sections 376, 406, 420 and 34

of the Indian Penal Code at the behest of the

informant.

5.

The applicant urges an intelligent submission

based on precedents of this court that such phy

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top