SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LOUIS PAULO FURTADO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['A D KANGO', 'APPOINTED', '', 'FOR FINAL HEARING', 'P P']

[1]

IN

IN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL

CRIMINAL

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.

APPELLATE JURISDICTION.

APPELLATE JURISDICTION.

CRIMINAL

CRIMINAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 509 OF 2000

APPEAL NO. 509 OF 2000

APPEAL NO. 509 OF 2000

Louis Paulo Furtado

....... Appellant.

versus

The State of Maharashtra

..... Respondents.

.....

Shri A.D.Kango advocate for the appellant -appointed.

Mrs. U.V.Kejariwal APP for the State.

.....

CORAM

CORAM

CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR

; V.G.PALSHIKAR

; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&

&

ANOOP

ANOOP

ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.

V. MOHTA, JJ.

V. MOHTA, JJ.

DATED;

DATED;

DATED; 14TH OCTOBER, 2004.

14TH OCTOBER, 2004.

14TH OCTOBER, 2004.

ORAL

ORAL

ORAL JUDGMENT ( Per Palshikar, J.);

JUDGMENT ( Per Palshikar, J.);

JUDGMENT ( Per Palshikar, J.);

1.

Being

aggrieved

by

the

the

order

of

conviction

passed

by

the

Additional

Sessions

Judge,

Greater

Bombay

in

Sessions

Case

No.487

of

1998

under

sections

302,

307,

392,

394

and

397

of

IPC

on

30/31-3-2000

the

appellant

ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top