LOUIS PAULO FURTADO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
[1]
IN
IN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL
CRIMINAL
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
CRIMINAL
CRIMINAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 509 OF 2000
APPEAL NO. 509 OF 2000
APPEAL NO. 509 OF 2000
Louis Paulo Furtado
....... Appellant.
versus
The State of Maharashtra
..... Respondents.
.....
Shri A.D.Kango advocate for the appellant -appointed.
Mrs. U.V.Kejariwal APP for the State.
.....
CORAM
CORAM
CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR
; V.G.PALSHIKAR
; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&
&
ANOOP
ANOOP
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
V. MOHTA, JJ.
V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATED;
DATED;
DATED; 14TH OCTOBER, 2004.
14TH OCTOBER, 2004.
14TH OCTOBER, 2004.
ORAL
ORAL
ORAL JUDGMENT ( Per Palshikar, J.);
JUDGMENT ( Per Palshikar, J.);
JUDGMENT ( Per Palshikar, J.);
1.
Being
aggrieved
by
the
the
order
of
conviction
passed
by
the
Additional
Sessions
Judge,
Greater
Bombay
in
Sessions
Case
No.487
of
1998
under
sections
302,
307,
392,
394
and
397
of
IPC
on
30/31-3-2000
the
appellant
ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.