SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
DNYANOBA TRIMBAK BUKKE AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
SULOCHANABAIMANOHAR KADWADE AND ORS – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO.8238 OF 2009

...

Dnyanoba s/o Trimbak Bukke and another

Petitioners.

V E R S U S

Sulochanabai w/o Manohar Kadwade and others.

Respondents.

Shri P.G. Rodge, Advocate for the petitioners.

Respondents No.1 to 4 served.

CORAM : S. B. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 18TH JANUARY, 2010.

PER COURT :-

1.

Heard learned counsel Mr. Rodge for the petitioners.

2.

The petitioners are original defendants No.1 and 2 in RCS No.

36/2003. Copy of the plaint is on record at annexure ‘A’ (page 10). It is

explicit from the copy of plaint that there are three plaintiffs namely : 1) Mrs.

Sulochanabai w/o Manohar Kadwade, 2) Mrs. Gangabai @ Parwatibai w/o

Shivaji Mule and 3) Mrs. Shantabai w/o Shivraj Mallishe. In this suit, there are

three defendants. Out of these three defendants, defendants No.1 and 2 have

filed this writ petition. Plaintiffs in this suit have prayed for a decree of

perpetual injunction against the defendants from interfering and/or

obstructing plaintiffs possession over the suit land gat No.57 to the extent of 0

H 83 R and gat No.74 to the extent of 1 H 21 R situated at village J

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top